USPTO serial 75848719
E-HUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-HUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leesa N. Weiss
LEESA N WEISS JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC; PRE-RECORDED CD ROMS ROMS FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS AND ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS AND ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 1999 |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS AND ELECTRONIC PROCUREMENT; CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS, POSTING THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER SURVEY FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; LEASING ACCESS TIME TO A FACILITY FEATURING A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK BASED LINK BETWEEN PURCHASERS AND SUPPLIERS INCLUDING MULTI-CURRENCY, MULTI-LANGUAGE, MULTI-TAX, MULTI-TAX, MULTI-PURCHASER, MULTI-SUPPLIER AND MULTI-NETWORK SUPPORT ACROSS THE WHOLE SPECTRUM OF THE SUPPLY CHAIN; AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT RELATING TO THE USE OF THE AFOREMENTIONED COMPUTER SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |