Drawing for CONSIDER IT SOLVED

USPTO serial 75848869

CONSIDER IT SOLVED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSIDER IT SOLVED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen W. Feingold

STEPHEN W FEINGOLD WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT & MORGAN, LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035telephone answering services; referrals in the field of floral reservations; referrals in the field of limousine reservations and referrals in the field of security servicesACTIVE—
036check cashing and safety deposit box servicesACTIVE—
037installation of VCRs, stereos and similar electronic devices; emergency plumbing services; emergency air conditioning repairs; cleaning of clothing; dry cleaning and maid servicesACTIVE—
039message delivery; arranging excursions for tourists; limousine services; food delivery; and delivery of gift and amenity basketsACTIVE—
042concierge services; making hotel reservations for others; emergency locksmith services; language translation services; catering; cocktail lounge buffets; coffee supply services; food preparation; food services (contract); and rental of food service equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance