USPTO serial 75849001
WINLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WINLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N-0502 Oslo, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC6500 CITY W PKWY STE 100EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-7704UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Terminal emulation computer programs for providing access, networking, and integrating of computers and printers; terminal emulation for computer programs for host access communications in the field of computer operating systems; computer programs for controlling and tracking network printing; data processing equipment, namely, card readers and monitors for use with network printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; leasing computers; updating and maintenance of computer programs; rental of computer programs; rental of computer software; computer consultation concerning computers and software; providing on-line information in the field of computers and software integration and networking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |