USPTO serial 75849191
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New Orleans, LA
New Orleans, LA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J Chalfie
EDWARD J CHALFIE LADAS & PARRYSTE 1200224 S MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60604| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, computer hardware, computer peripherals, hand held computers, personal digital assistants, wireless telephones, wireless personal communicators and computer software for monitoring and verifying business personnel responsibilities, not for use in monitoring Internet activity | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services, namely, monitoring and verification services in the area of personnel responsibilities, not including monitoring Internet activity | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |