USPTO serial 75849582
DIAMONDS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIAMONDS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BAILA H. CELEDONIA
BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN KIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Interactive trading services in the field of jewelry, precious stones, semi-precious stones, gems and watches by means of computer networks and global computer networks-- shipping services in the field of jewelry, precious stones, semi-precious stones, gems and watches, namely; arranging for pickup, delivery and transportation of parcels containing such items via ground; sea and air carriers; online marketing and advertising services in the field of jewelry, precious stones, semi-precious stones, gems and watches, namely, by operating on-line marketplaces for sellers of goods and by providing a website which features advertisements for the goods and services of others on a global computer network-- business, trade and consumer information in the field of jewelry; precious stones, semi-precious stones, gems and watches; providing a database of business, trade and consumer information in the field of jewelry, precious stones,semi-precious stones, gems and watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | lnteractive brokerage services in the field of jewelry, precious stones, semi-precious stones; gems and watches by means of computer networks and global computer networks;online appraisal services in the field of jewelry, precious stones, semi-precious stones, gems and watches-- appraisals for insurance claims in the field of jewelry, precious stones, semi-precious stones; gems and watches; insurance brokerage in the field of jewelry, precious stones,semi-precious stones, gems and watches; insurance consultation in the field of jewelry; precious stones; semi-precious stones, gems and watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line electronic bulletin boards, chat rooms and news agency services for transmission of messages and information among computer users in the field of jewelry,precious stones, semi-precious stones, gems and watches | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing computer programming and database design services in the field of jewelry,diamonds, precious stones, semi-precious stones, gems, and watches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAPAPORT, MARTIN
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DIAMONDS.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |