USPTO serial 75849597
GOODLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOODLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
London, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SERGE ANISSIMOFF
SERGE ANISSIMOFF ANISSIMOFF & ASSOCIATES235 N CTR RD STE 201LONDON, ON N5X 4E7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Health and fitness centers offering programs, classes, education and instruction relating to physical fitness, aerobics, free weights, personal exercise training and featuring exercise bicycles, rowing machines and multi-station weight training equipment; providing recreational facilities for aquatic activities, namely, physical water exercises, providing tennis court, racquet ball court and squash court facilities; education services, namely, seminars, workshops and conferences relating to health care, fitness, wellness and the management and operation of health, fitness and wellness centers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |