Drawing for ECARDSMART

USPTO serial 75849803

ECARDSMART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECARDSMART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CATHRYN A. BERRYMAN

CATHRYN A BERRYMAN JENKENS & GILCHRIST1445 ROSS AVESTE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business management and consultation services, namely, strategic management consulting and analysisACTIVE—
036financial services, namely, electronic payment processing services; providing a website featuring financial information, namely, electronic payment processing informationACTIVE—
042computer consulting services in the field of card and electronic payment processing; computer hardware and software design for others; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for processing, tracking and analyzing personal and business financial information, credit card payments and transactions and electronic payments and transactions; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, e-mail and in personACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance