USPTO serial 75850246
PAPERLESS INK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAPERLESS INK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mountain View, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SECURITY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE USED FOR THE SUPPORT AND RELAY, NAMELY, FUNCTION PERFORMED BY INTENDED SOFTWARE, OFFICE PROCESS AUTOMATION, ACCESS CONTROL, DIGITAL CERTIFICATE ISSUANCE, REVOCATION, AND MANAGEMENT, CLIENT/SERVER SECURITY, CONTENT FILTERING SOFTWARE, DATABASE SECURITY, DATABASE SECURITY, DIGITAL FORENSIC ANALYSIS, DISASTER RECOVERY/BUSINESS CONTINUITY, E-MAIL SECURITY, E-COMMERCE, ENCRYPTION, ENTERPRISE SECURITY MANAGEMENT, FIREWALLS, INTERNET/INTRANET-SECURITY CONTROLS, INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS, ISP SERVICES, JAVA/ACTIVEX SECURITY, LAN/WAN SECURITY, MAINFRAME SECURITY, MANAGED SECURITY, MODEM SWEEPERS, NETWORK/ COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY, SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SINGLE SIGN-ON, SMART CARDS, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETS (VPNs), VIRUS PROTECTION, WIRELESS/MOBILE SECURITY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |