USPTO serial 75850880
HAPPY ANGEL HEART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAPPY ANGEL HEART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear; head wear; and clothing, namely, shirts, shoes, skirts, shorts, hats, t-shirts, coats, jackets, caps, sweat suits, sweat pants, sweat shirts, tops, bottoms, pants, skorts, scarves, jumpsuits, jumpers, sweaters, visors, vests, socks, underwear, swim trunks, bathing suits, trousers, tennis wear, tank tops, wet suits, gym suits, jogging suits, play suits, stockings, sport shirts, sport coats, golf shirts, golf pants, golf hats, golf shorts, ski jackets, ski pants, ski shirts, ski hats, ski gloves, ski boots, ski boot bags, rainwear, polo shirts, parkas, pullovers, neckwear, pantsuits, pajamas, night gowns, night shirts, mittens, loungewear, leggings, leotards, leg warmers, jerseys, jerkins, jeans, leather coats, leather jackets, wind resistant jackets, housecoats, infantwear, dresses, cloth diapers, cloth bibs, shower caps, belts, beachwear, beach coverups, coverups, bathing caps, baseball caps, sweat bands, wrist bands, neck bands, head bands, bandanas, athletic uniforms, and aprons | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | SEAP | SU - EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | SPEA | SU - EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |