Drawing for SPEEDCLAMP

USPTO serial 75851306

SPEEDCLAMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDCLAMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee Merriman Nolan,

AIMEE MERRIMAN NOLAN W W GRAINGER, INC100 GRAINGER PKWYLAKE FOREST, IL 60045-5201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011IN-LINE AIR SYSTEM HARDWARE COMPONENT, NAMELY, A MATING CLAMP USED TO ALLOW FOR DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS OF AIR PREPARATION FILTERS, AIR REGULATORS, AND AIR LUBRICATORSACTIVEFeb 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 17, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance