USPTO serial 75851450
KAPULA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAPULA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KAPULA CANDLES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
Western Cape, ZA
Other trademarks owned by KAPULA CANDLES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
KAPULA CANDLES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
Western Cape, ZA
Other trademarks owned by KAPULA CANDLES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
Appletree Enterprises Trust and Daniel Simoleit
Bredasdorp, Western Cape, ZA
Other trademarks owned by Appletree Enterprises Trust and Daniel Simoleit
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Larry H. Tronco
ELIZABETH ATKINS DUANE MORRIS LLP380 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10168UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail and wholesale stores featuring candles; distributorship in the field of candles; franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of gift stores and candle stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KAPULA CANDLES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by KAPULA CANDLES (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Appletree Enterprises Trust and Daniel Simoleit
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named KAPULA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |