Drawing for SPEEDMAX

USPTO serial 75851787

SPEEDMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEEDMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN J. HOLMES, Esq.

STEPHEN J HOLMES ESQ BARLOW, JOSEPHS & HOLMES101 DYER ST 5TH FLPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machines for deposition of solder and other electronic materials on printed circuit boards, namely, screen printers and adhesive dispensersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 10, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Sep 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Apr 1, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 20, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 20, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 27, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 27, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 10, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 10, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance