USPTO serial 75852276
GERBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GERBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A FRIEDMAN
RICHARD A FRIEDMAN NOARTIS CORP564 MORRIS AVESUMMIT, NJ 07901-1027UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | baby shampoo, baby skin and body lotion; baby hair and body wash; baby oil; baby powder, non-medicated diaper rash ointment and lotion; tooth and gum cleanser for babies | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 005 | pediatric electrolytes; pharmaceutical preparations, namely, liquid drops for the relief of gastro intestinal distress; menthol vapor bath preparations for babies; vitamin drops; medicated diaper rash ointment and lotion | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |