USPTO serial 75852382
E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH R. WRIGHT
KENNETH R WRIGHT HAYES SIMPSON GREENE LLP600 W BROADWAY 4TH FLSAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Surfboards and surfboard accessories, namely, surfboard leashes, surfboard nose protectors, surfboard decks, surfboard fins, surfboard wax and surfboard equipment bags | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |