USPTO serial 75852502
EFUNDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3342373Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EFUNDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas A. Miller, Esq.
THOMAS A MILLER ESQ MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 3300MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ACCOUNT VERIFICATION SERVICES, NAMELY CHECK VERIFICATION AND CREDIT CARD VERIFICATION; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE SERVICES, NAMELY CUSTOMER FINANCIAL ADVICE AND DECISIONING, FUNDING, PAYMENT AND DEBIT PROCESSING, SETTLEMENT AND FULFILLMENT, AUTOMATED TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND VERIFICATION, AND PROVIDING AUTOMATED CLEARING HOUSE, AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE, POINT-OF-SALE AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK BANKING AND FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS; ELECTRONIC CHECK PROCESSING AND CONVERSION; ELECTRONIC CHECK RE-PRESENTMENT; FINANCIAL ANALYSIS SERVICES, NAMELY AGGREGATING AND ANALYZING DATA GENERATED BY DEMAND DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND PREPARING RELATED REPORTS; ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUNDS AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION CATALOGUING AND RESEARCHING INFORMATION AND TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER; PROCESSING OF PAYMENT AUTHORIZATIONS; VERIFICATION OF PAYMENTS REQUESTS AND FUNDS SUFFICIENCY; CATALOGUING CUSTOMER ACCOUNT DATA; AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE SERVICES, NAMELY CASH MANAGEMENT, BALANCING AND SETTLEMENT; CARD ISSUANCE AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY AUTHORIZATION, ON-LINE ORDERING OF CHECKS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER HANDLING, AUDITING, SECURITY AND REPORT GENERATION; FRAUD AND RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY POINT-OF-SALE, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK-BASED AND IN-BRANCH DETECTION OF CHECK, DEBIT AND CREDIT CARD FRAUD, AND INFORMATION COMPARISON AND IDENTITY MANIPULATION SEARCHING | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by eFunds Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by eFunds Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by eFunds Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named EFUNDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |