USPTO serial 75852884
HECKERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HECKERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Horst M. Kasper
HORST M KASPER13 FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Development of software programs for data processing in connection with milling and machining applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |