USPTO serial 75853132
EMIGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMIGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay P. Lessler
Jay P. Lessler Blank Rome LLPThe Chrysler Building 405 Lexington Ave22nd FloorNew York, NY 10174-0208Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DRUG DELIVERY AGENTS AND SYSTEMS CONSISTING SOLELY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS THAT FACILITATE DELIVERY OF A WIDE RANGE OF PHARMACEUTICALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 22, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMISPHERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EMISPHERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EMISPHERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named EMIGENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |