Drawing for CELLPOD

USPTO serial 75853254

CELLPOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CELLPOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Rosenburgh

LISA ROSENBURGH GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP855 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telephone with interface to mobile telephones and other computers comprised of a telephone with caller identification, speaker telephone, answering machine, audio conferencing and voice and audio recorder; cradle units for holding and synchronization of voice and audio data with hand-held units and computer; voice control device, namely, volume controls and voice recognition for use with hand-held units and computers; microphone and related computer operating software for computer audio uses; microphone and related software for computer audio uses; computer hardware and software for use in creating audio records and uploading and downloading audio records to and from web pages and wide area compute network sites; computer software for use in acquiring, capturing, creating, playing, converting, transferring, presenting and storing audio recording; and instruction manuals sold as a unit for all of the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance