USPTO serial 75853315
CAHOOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAHOOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Scully
JOANNE SCULLY WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer communications software for connecting user of electronic communications networks; computer communications software to allow access to business account information by means of local and global computer networks; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions; computer communications software to enable users to set up and use chat rooms, electronic bulletin boards, and electronic conversation areas on electronic communications networks concerning topics selected by the users | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing access to a computer network that enables communications between users of electronic communications networks; providing chat rooms and private online conversation areas by means of electronic communications networks for text, audio and/or video communications concerning topics selected by user | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GetWebby.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CAHOOTS.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CAHOOTS.COM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CAHOOTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named CAHOOTS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |