Drawing for ONEBODY.COM

USPTO serial 75853431

ONEBODY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, BRIAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONEBODY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Scheller

JAMES C SCHELLER520 S W YAMHILL ST STE 20012400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing on-line business management services, namely, scheduling services, group purchasing and diagnostic services in the field of healthcare by means of a global computer network; physician referrals in the field of healthcare provided via a global computer network; on-line retail services in the field of healthcareACTIVE—
038providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users in the field of healthcare; telecommunications services, namely, provided a gateway link in the field of healthcareACTIVE—
041providing continuing education in the field of healthcare by means of a computer networkACTIVE—
042providing news and information in the field of healthcare by means of a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; healthcare services; health care services in the nature of providing research in the field of healthcare for others; computer services, namely providing on-line publications in the nature of books, magazines and newsletters in the field of healthcare via a global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance