Drawing for IVANTEC

USPTO serial 75853677

IVANTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IVANTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK J. COYNE

PATRICK J COYNE COLLIER, SHANNON, RILL & SCOTT, PLLC3050 K ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC FIELD EMITTER PANELS, ELECTRONIC FIELD EMITTER LIGHT SOURCES, ELECTRONIC FIELD EMITTER POWER TRIODES, ELECTRONIC FIELD EMITTER COMPUTER MODULES, ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODES, ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAYS, DISPLAY-OPTIC MODULES, HEADSET MOUNTED, DIRECT VIEW, AND OPTICALLY-VIEWED DISPLAYS AND COMPONENTS THEREFOR, OPTICS, OPTIC DISPLAY DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS-RELATED PRODUCTS, AND LITHOGRAPHIC IMAGING SYSTEMS, TOOLS, AND COMPONENTS THEREFOR, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND POLYMER AND MOLECULAR ORGANIC ELECTRONICS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND MATERIALS THEREFORACTIVE—
042TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, OPTICS, DISPLAY, AND HEADSET MOUNTED DISPLAY PRODUCT DESIGN SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance