USPTO serial 75853679
LUMIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUMIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hopewell Junction, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic Field Emitter Panels, Electronic Field Emitter Light Sources, Electronic Field Emitter Power Triodes, Electronic Field Emitter Computer Modules, Organic Light Emitting Diodes, Organic Light Emitting Displays, Display-Optic Modules, Headset Mounted, Direct View, and Optically- Viewed Displays and Components Therefor, Optics, Optic Display Devices, Systems, and Components, Telecommunications-Related Products, and Lithographic Imaging Systems, Tools, and Components Therefor, Integrated Circuits, and Polymer and Molecular Organic Electronics, Components, Systems, and Materials Therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Telecommunications, Integrated Circuit, Optics, Display, and Headset Mounted Display Product Design Services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |