USPTO serial 75854149
HATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY S. CRAIG
LESLEY S CRAIG TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTOW EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING BUSINESS STATISTICAL INFORMATION; BUSINESS OPERATION AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES RELATING TO TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR OTHERS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS AND ACCOMPANYING SWITCHING STATIONS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, LONG DISTANCE, CELLULAR TELEPHONE AND PAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE AND VIDEO MESSAGES AND DATA; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT AND DESIGN OF FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS AND ACCOMPANYING SWITCHING STATIONS FOR OTHERS; TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CROSSBOW ACQUISITIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CROSSBOW ACQUISITIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Aerie Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HATCH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |