Drawing for SHOP AND CHAT

USPTO serial 75854861

SHOP AND CHAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOP AND CHAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven T. Shelton

STEVEN T SHELTON ROGERS & WELLS LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0153UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing commercial information in the field of comparison shopping via a global computer networks; computerized retail department store services, namely, on-line searching and orderingACTIVE—
038Providing on-line real-time interaction among computer users concerning consumer goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance