USPTO serial 75855819
Serial No. 75855819
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 75855819?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1118 BH Schiphol Airport, NL
Schiphol Airport 118 BH, NL
Hoofddorp, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W SMITH
LINDA HEILMAN RECKITT BENCKISER INC1655 VALLEY RDWAYNE, NJ 07470UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals for use in the manufacture of detergents in the consumer cleaning products industry; descaling chemicals for use in the manufacture of laundry detergents; water softener salt | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | laundry bleach and detergent; laundry preparations for dry cleaner; general purpose household cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; carpet cleaners; laundry and dishwashing detergents; chemical decalcifying and descaling laundry preparations and all-purpose household cleaners; water softener sold in a laundry detergent; laundry additives, namely, bleach, bluing, pre-soak, and fabric softeners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |