USPTO serial 75856496
PANACOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANACOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J. Gaudet,
STEPHEN J GAUDET BROWN RUDNICK FREED GESME1 FINANCIAL CTR STE 1802BOSTON, MA 02111-2600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | THERAPEUTIC AND PROPHYLACTIC PREPARATIONS AND PHARMACEUTICALS USED IN THE TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF HUMANS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |