Drawing for RED HAT READY

USPTO serial 75857439

RED HAT READY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED HAT READY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Tiller

Robert Tiller Red Hat, Inc.1801 Varsity Dr.Raleigh, NC 27606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
ACertification of computer hardware and computer applications software manufactured or produced by othersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 22, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 7, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jul 7, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Apr 4, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 30, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 31, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 4, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 30, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance