USPTO serial 75857624
PERFECTPRACTICE.MD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFECTPRACTICE.MD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anil N. Koshy
MICHELE D HILTON ADVANCEDMD SOFTWARE INC2795 E COTTONWOOD PKWY STE 120SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84121UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized on-line services for database management of medical and dental practices and for business management of medical and dental practices through use of computer software | ABANDONED | Jun 19, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |