USPTO serial 75857735
RONAKE VAULT-GUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RONAKE VAULT-GUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TOD R. NISSLE
TOD R NISSLE TOD R NISSLE PCP O BOX 55630PHOENIX, AZ 85078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VAULT MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, NAMELY A SECURITY SYSTEM COMPRISED OF BIOMETRIC SECURITY SCANNERS, FINGERPRINT READING SCANNERS, OR PALM PRINT READING SCANNERS, ELECTRONIC LOCK AND OPERATING SOFTWARE TO MONITOR INDIVIDUALS ENTERING AND LEAVING A BANK VAULT AND TO MONITOR SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES IN THE VAULT, INCLUDING MONITORING THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES IN A VAULT, THE NUMBER OF SAFE DEPOSIT BOXES RENTED, THE LENGTH OF TIME A SAFE DEPOSIT BOX IN A VAULT HAS BEEN RENTED, AND THE RENTAL INCOME GENERATED BY THE BOXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |