USPTO serial 75858096
E-MINDER ELECTRONIC POLICY MANAGER BY CONQUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-MINDER ELECTRONIC POLICY MANAGER BY CONQUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Dingman
Brian M. Dingman Mirick O'Connell DeMallie & Lougee LLP1800 West Park DriveSuite 400Westborough, MA 01581-3926Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BROWSER-BASED COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT IS USED TO TRACK AND EDUCATE EMPLOYEES ON CORPORATE POLICIES REGARDING E-MAIL, COMPUTER AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS USAGE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |