USPTO serial 75858713
SBLI USA LIFE INSURANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SBLI USA LIFE INSURANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | insurance and financial services, namely, underwriting annuities and underwriting life insurance, health insurance and accident insurance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |