USPTO serial 75859004
FLEETPILOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEETPILOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PURVI J PATEL
PURVI J PATEL HAYNES AND BOONE LLP901 MAIN ST STE 3100DALLAS, TX 75202-3789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND ASSOCIATED COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELDS OF VEHICLE DISPATCH MANAGEMENT, INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, WORK-ORDER MANAGEMENT AND OPTIMIZATION, FLEET TRACKING SYSTEMS, SMART-ROUTING FOR SERVICE VEHICLES, TRACKING VEHICLE LOCATION, ENABLING VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS, AND MONITORING CABLE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC DATABASE ENABLING THE STORAGE AND MANAGEMENT OF CABLESYSTEM PERFORMANCE DATA, VEHICLE DISPATCH INFORMATION, INVENTORY DATA, WORK-ORDER DATA, FLEET TRACKING INFORMATION AND OTHER TECHNICAL INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE INTERACTIVE SERVICES FOR VEHICLE DISPATCH MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL SUPERVISION AND CONTROL OF FLEET TRACKING SYSTEMS, NAMELY SMART ROUTING SERVICE VEHICLES AND TRACKING VEHICLE LOCATION AND MONITORING CABLE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR INTERACTIVE VEHICLE DISPATCH MANAGEMENT, INVENTORY MANAGEMENT, WORK-ORDER MANAGEMENT AND OPTIMIZATION, FLEET TRACKING SYSTEMS, SMART-ROUTING FOR SERVICE VEHICLES, TRACKING VEHICLE LOCATION, ENABLING VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS, AND MONITORING CABLE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CABLE LEAKAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CABLE LEAKAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLEETPILOT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |