USPTO serial 75859396
WORDQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2003
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WORDQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
HOLLAND BLOORVIEW KIDS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
TORONTO, CA
Other trademarks owned by HOLLAND BLOORVIEW KIDS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
TORONTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Denys
Todd Denys Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C.100 Southgate ParkwayMorristown, NJ 07962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WORD COMPLETION AND PREDICTION SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH WORD PROCESSING SOFTWARE, AND MANUALS, SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUILLSOFT LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BLOORVIEW MACMILLAN CENTRE
- Other trademarks owned by BLOORVIEW MACMILLAN CENTRE
- Other trademarks owned by BLOORVIEW MACMILLAN CENTRE
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLAND BLOORVIEW KIDS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
- Other trademarks owned by BLOORVIEW KIDS REHAB
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WORDQ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 26, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 26, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 27, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |