USPTO serial 75859441
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES IN THE DESIGN AND USABILITY TESTING OF USER INTERFACES FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE, AND OTHER COMPUTER-RELATED GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1999 |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS; WEBSITE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF USER INTERFACES FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER HARDWARE, AND OTHER COMPUTER-RELATED GOODS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |