Drawing for LIGHTSCAPES

USPTO serial 75859491

LIGHTSCAPES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIGHTSCAPES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil M. Zipkin

NEIL M ZIPKIN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004CANDLE ARRANGEMENTS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF CANDLES AND CANDLE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, ALL SOLD AS A UNITABANDONEDJan 31, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 22, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 15, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Apr 15, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Nov 2, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 27, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 29, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Mar 23, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance