Drawing for EPOC

USPTO serial 75859547

EPOC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPOC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark L. Kaufmann

MARK L KAUFMANN SIDLEY & AUSTINBANK ONE PLZ STE 5100CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and electronic equipment, namely, computers; telephones; and handheld wireless communication devices, namely, cellular telephones and handheld computers; computer software for the design, development, modelling, simulation, compiling, de-bugging, verification, construction and interfacing of said equipment; and computer operating system programs in the telecommunications fieldACTIVE
016Printed materials, namely, product labels, brochures, data sheets, and instruction and development manuals for computers; telephones; and handheld wireless communication devices, namely, cellular telephones and handheld computers; computer software for the design, development, modelling, simulation, compiling, de-bugging, verification, construction and interfacing of said equipment; and computer application, utility, and operating system programs in the telecommunications fieldACTIVE
035Business services, namely, the licensing of computer softwareACTIVE
037Repair services, namely, the maintenance of computer hardware components and equipmentACTIVE
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing voice and data transmission services for telephones; and handheld wireless communication devices, namely, cellular telephones and handheld computersACTIVE
042Computer services, namely, providing consulting, design, and maintenance of computer software for the development, modelling, simulation, compiling, de-bugging, verification, construction and interfacing of electrical and electronic equipment, namely, computers; telephones; and handheld wireless communication devices, namely, cellular telephones and handheld computers; and computer of application, utility, and operating system programs in the telecommunications field; providing research and development for others of new products as to electrical and electronic equipment, namely, computers; telephones; and handheld wireless communication devices, namely, cellular telephones and handheld computers; computer software for the design, development, modelling, simulation, compiling, de-bugging, verification, construction and interfacing of said equipment; and computer application, utility, and operating system programs in the telecommunications field; and providing information about such services via the global computer information networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Mar 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
May 14, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 22, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 21, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance