Drawing for ONLINECLINICS.COM

USPTO serial 75859663

ONLINECLINICS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONLINECLINICS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig J.J. Snyder

CRAIG J J SNYDER67 WALL ST STE 2411NEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042CREATING, DEVELOPING, HOSTING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS AND PROVIDING A WEBSITE FEATURING GENERAL INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF PSYCHOTHERAPYACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Oct 27, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Aug 11, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2002REINREINSTATED
May 31, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 4, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance