USPTO serial 75860166
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Wehrli
JOHN E WEHRLI9880 CAMPUS POINT DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in Agriculture | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, fungicides, pestigices, herbicides | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific Apparatus and Instruments, Data Processing Equipment and Computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and Industrial Research, Computer Programming | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |