USPTO serial 75861058
SIP TIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIP TIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie K. Wade
STEPHANIE K WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY LLP2101 L ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | calendars; newsletters, and printed informational and educational materials featuring information on alcoholic beverages and accessories used in the storage and consumption of alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring alcoholic beverages and accessories used in the storage and consumption of alcoholic beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |