USPTO serial 75861362
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC1533 N WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | FEEDERS FOR PAPER STOCK, CARD STOCK, AND SMALL THREE- DIMENSIONAL ITEMS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |