USPTO serial 75861542
IHDTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2664721Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IHDTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Everett E. Fruehling
Everett E. Fruehling Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness1420 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO STORAGE MEDIA CONTAINING VIDEO PROGRAMS RELATING TO ACADEMIC, BUSINESS, AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, NAMELY, PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES, COMPACT DISCS, LASER DISCS, DVDS, AND MEMORY CARDS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 2, 1999 |
| 038 | broadcasting programs via cable television, broadcast television, ITFS television, satellite, global computer network, and wireless video transmission and distribution systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 19, 1999 |
| 041 | [ production of video programs relating to information of academic, business, and scientific research institutions ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |