Drawing for OPENMERCHANT

USPTO serial 75861720

OPENMERCHANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAUEN, JAMES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPENMERCHANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy S. Gordet

ROY S GORDET1095 MARKET ST STE 606SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for electronic commerce, namely for facilitating on-line retail sales of third parties, for facilitating business to business transactions, for managing content describing merchandise, for tracking inventory, for managing the shipping and ordering of goods, for integrating databases, for providing statistical tracking information concerning web site users, and related documentation distributed therewithACTIVE
035business consulting services relating to electronic commerce and relating to computer software used for electronic commerceACTIVE
040services for the custom manufacturing for others of computer software relating to electronic commerceACTIVE
042product development services for others relating to electronic commerce and relating to software for electronic commerce; technical consulting services relating to electronic commerce and relating to computer software used for electronic commerceACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 19, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance