USPTO serial 75861981
DEFENDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEFENDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Warwick, Warwickshire CV350RR, GB
Warwick CV34 6RG, GB
Warwick CV34 6RG, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANESSA OWEN KRAMER
ANESSA OWEN KRAMER BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Four wheel drive all-terrain vehicles; sports utility vehicles, station wagons and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Automotive manuals | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets and mats adapted for use in motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | SCALE MODELS AND TOY MODELS, ALL OF MOTOR LAND VEHICLES, ALL SOLD COMPLETE OR IN KIT FORM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Land Rover
- Other trademarks owned by Rover Group Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Rover Group Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named DEFENDER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |