USPTO serial 75862159
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Edmonton, Alberta, T6E 5V2, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas B. Thompson
DOUGLAS B THOMPSON#103, 10328 - 81 AVEEDMONTON, AB T6E 1X2CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer integrated weigh scale used to determine the accuracy of assembled orders | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |