USPTO serial 75862456
IMANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2601852Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Mulholland
Susan M. Mulholland GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STREETBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; CUSTOM SOFTWARE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FOR OTHERS; AND PROVIDING APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER SERVICES FOR OTHERS FEATURING SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF CONTRACT PURCHASING ARRANGEMENTS TO FACILITATE BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS E-COMMERCE BY ALLOWING CUSTOMERS TO IDENTIFY AND MANAGE SPECIFIC CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND INCENTIVES, REBATES, AND PAYMENT PROVISION AVAILABLE | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by I-MANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by I-MANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SYSTEMS CONSULTING COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by I-MANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IMANY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jan 6, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |