Drawing for PB PIERRE BALMAIN PARIS

USPTO serial 75863298

PB PIERRE BALMAIN PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PB PIERRE BALMAIN PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

Stephen L. Baker Baker and Ranells, PA575 Route 28, Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014GOLD, SILVER, PRECIOUS METAL AND METAL PLATED JEWELRY, NAMELY, COSTUME JEWELRY, CHAINS, NECKLACES, NECKBANDS, BRACELETS, RINGS, CHARMS, PINS, WRISTBANDS, EARRINGS, JEWELRY BOXES, PRECIOUS STONES, PEARLS, PENDANTS, CUFF LINKS, TIE CLIPS, TIE PINS, TIE TACKS, NECKLACES THAT TIE, MONEY CLIPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 21, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 21, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 9, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 17, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 13, 2005WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2005WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance