Drawing for ITVILLAGE.COM

USPTO serial 75863815

ITVILLAGE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MOONEYHAM, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ITVILLAGE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Sprinkle

DAVID J SPRINKLE LASHER HOIZAPFEL SPERRY & EBBERSON, PL2600 TWO UNION SQ 601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic site accessed through computer networks; providing product or service information, commentary, evaluations or descriptions over global computer networks, all in the fields of computers, computing, high technology, electronic communications or digital technologies; computer services, namely, providing computer databases, conference calling and electronic meeting places over global computer networks featuring product or service information in the fields of computers, computing, high technology, electronic communications or digital technologies; business consulting; advertising consulting; marketing research services; providing information and interactive services over global computer networks in the fields of recruitment, employment, employment advertising, careers, resume creation, resume posting, transmittals and responses thereto and resume matching services; providing an on-line link to the employment and career websites of others; on-line trading services in which seller posts items to be auctioned and bidding is done electronically, and providing evaluative feedback and ratings of sellers’ goodsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance