Drawing for ITVILLAGE.COM

USPTO serial 75863817

ITVILLAGE.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MOONEYHAM, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ITVILLAGE.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Sprinkle

DAVID J SPRINKLE LASHER HOLZAPFEL SPERRY & EBBERSON, PL2600 TWO UNION SQ 601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101-4000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, providing databases over global computer networks featuring information of interest to information technology providers; providing interactive computer databases, conference calling, electronic meeting places and information over global computer networks concerning information technology, computers, computing, high technology, electronic communication or digital technologies; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining computer software and for subsequent delivery or distribution of that software by means of electronic communications networks; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites, and other resources available on computer networks; searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on computer networks for others; providing an online link to news, news groups, information technology experts, white papers, patches and downloads, books, magazines, project plans and reference materials; career counseling services; mail order and retail services for a wide range of technological products; computer and technology consultation services; providing and distributing information of interest to information systems providers via a global computer network; and providing access via a global computer network to electronic bulletin boards in fields of particular interest to information systems providersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance