USPTO serial 75864482
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pittsburgh, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A. KASSEL
FOLEY & LARDNER150 E GILMAN STMADISON, WI 53703UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for cataloging, indexing, managing, searching, and retrieving audio and video clips; computer software for using audio and video clips; computer software for cataloging, indexing, managing, searching, and retrieving audio and video clips via a global computer network; computer software for using audio and video clips via a global computer network; computer software for use in designing, creating, hosting, and accessing web sites via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 1999 |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, disseminating advertisements for others in connection with digital programming by means of a global computer network; computerized ordering services featuring the wholesale and retail distribution of audio and video clips by means of a global computer network; retail store services featuring audio and video clips; online retail sales services featuring audio and video clips | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
| 038 | Communications services, namely, providing transmission of digitized audio and video clips by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
| 041 | Distribution of audio and video clips by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing, creating, and hosting web sites for others; computer consulting services, namely, consulting relating to cataloging, indexing, managing, searching, retrieving, and using audio and video clips | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |