Drawing for PINKBAG

USPTO serial 75864625

PINKBAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ALVES, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PINKBAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin B. Schwimmer

MARTIN B SCHWIMMER7 BAYBERRY DRNEW YORK, NY 10570UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services namely the electronic transmission of data and image information for consumer goods to vendors and retailers; providing multiple-user access to a global computer network; satellite transmission services; facsimile transmission services; electronic data interchange services in the consumer product industry; electronic voice message, namely, transmission for voice messages via an electronic network; providing on line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for the transmission of messages among computer users concerning certain consumer goods and related services; video conferencing services; electronic mail services; and providing an interactive on-line service for the exchange of information in the consumer products industry between vendors, retailers and consumersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 17, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance